From Psychic & Spirit Online Magazine
Astrology
Uranus and Democracy, part 2, by Jessica Murray
By Jessica Murray
Sep 27, 2005, 09:20


Per the Law of Correspondences, Uranus was officially recognized as a planet during the period between the American and French revolutions. It is said to govern all independence

movements, wherein one (usually newer) group rebels from another (usually older) group.  On a philosophical level, Uranian ideas are those which champion the rights of the individual over those of the state. Thus Uranus is traditionally linked with democracy and capitalism, while Neptune, the planet of unified, undifferentiated masses, is linked with communism and socialism.

 

Democracy

Uranus is the first of three planets that orbit beyond Saturn, whose dark side is expressed by enslavement to form and tradition. Thus Uranus signifies the will to break through bondage and to repudiate antededents.

 

Historically, when the time had come for this radical new concept to dawn in the collective consciousness, along came a bright new idea in government: one that championed the right of individuals to overthrow tyrants and think for themselves.  Defiance and dissent are at the Uranian core of true democracies (in this context we are excepting the ancient Greek and Roman models, which could be classified as proto-democratic).

 

Does today’s USA meet the Uranian standard for democracy?

Certainly the word is a current favorite in the mainstream American media, who take their cue from White House language-spinners. But beneath the veneer of verbiage, American political realities are becoming more and more estranged from Uranian impulses.  So removed, in spirit and practice, has American democracy become from its key tenets that its most heated proponents seem to be deriving their inspiration more from vague and distant references in their grammar school textbooks than from direct experience of the society in which they live.

 

Uranus: a mental planet

Democracy, like other Uranian constructs, depends upon a high-level use of the mind. Uranian thinking is independent, crisp and explicit.  Unlike Neptune, which is associated with water, Uranus is associated with air at its most stubbornly abstract. Uranus represents intellect without the baggage of subjectivity. This is why it governs science, whose classical goal is knowledge stripped of prejudice and illusion.

 

In the opinion of the 18th-century radicals who drafted the U.S. Constitution, emotion was not an ally of clear thinking. Democracy was to be protected at all costs from the caprices of charismatic leaders and the vagaries of mass mood. When constructing their elegant theoretical arguments, Jefferson and Adams were not after pulse-quickening rhetoric; they felt it detracted from sound reason. They avoided appealing to deities. They were against regalia. They were not into brass bands.

 

What would these sober gentlemen make of the hyperbolic bombast that saturates every reference to democracy in America these days?

 

Exploited idealism

In the America of today, “democracy” is less a description of government than a mind-control technique. When Bush uses the word in one of his speeches, the public seems to take leave of its senses. Eyes moisten en masse, Pavlov’s- dog-style, and amidst all the snuffling and flag-saluting, woe betide any citizen who dares to insist upon what democracy really means.

 

From its beginnings as a Uranian challenge intended to empower the individual, democracy is now a buzzword used to disempower the individual.  Pimped by America’s current leaders for its nationalistic charge, democracy is being pressed into service as a foreign policy ruse. With their initial arguments for invading Iraq universally discredited, the cartel in power has seized upon “democracy” as the new rationale. 

 

First the “mushroom cloud” scenario was used to appeal to the American public’s fear; now the “democracy” scenario is being used to appeal to its idealism. 

 

Democracy as sacred myth

The peculiar cynicism behind this tactic puts it in a special category all its own. Democracy is a quasi-religious concept in the American mass mind; the U.S. Constitution comes as close as this secular society gets to holy writ. When politicians invoke this iconography, they are reaching up into a potent and rarified zone of the American imagination.

 

The Bush camp is now bolstering its original tactic -- appealing to our fear of danger (Saturn in Cancer on the USA Sun cluster) -- with a ruse qualitatively more manipulative, and sad. When the president’s scriptwriters invoke the American Revolution, they are exploiting America’s desperate yearning to believe in itself (Pluto in Sagittarius in the USA first house).

 

Democracy and imperialism

In these days of desolate cynicism, the government’s appeals find fertile ground. Amazingly, democracy is now being touted as a rationale for imperialistic assault.  The neo-con doctrine ominously entitled “The New American Century” tells us that Washington intends to install, one by one in various hand-picked countries (they’ve gone so far as to publish a list of them),  a series of militarily-imposed “democracies”. This is certainly a new take on the word. In this context it is meant to signify the kind of government America thinks it has. But it actually means the kind of government our leaders want these countries to have; which is to say, not democracy at all. 

 

This campaign of take-it-or-leave-it "democracy" is an idea that could only fly in a country where most of the citizenry has no sense of world history, ancient or modern. Perhaps the only thing more absurd than the claim that a government of the people, for the people and by the people could be established right now in Iraq -- a state that was starved to attrition for thirteen years of sanctions and is now being destroyed with guns and bombs -- is the notion that a U.S.-style government should be imposed upon a civilization whose ancestors came up with the Code of Hammarabi thousands of years before America’s Founding Fathers were born.

 

Self-determination

Even were this conceit to be accepted at its face value, the question immediately arises: what if the people of Iraq, once possessed of self-determination, opted for a scenario Washington didn’t like? Like, voting to boot the USA out of their country and returning control of their natural resources to themselves?  Most Americans are not connecting the dots enough to ask this question. Perhaps it is because everyone subliminally understands that nothing could be further from what U.S. policymakers intend for the Middle East.

 

If the American public is allowing itself any soul-searching at all about Iraq, it seems to be confined to the simplistic surface of the missionaries-for-democracy trope. With religious fervor inflaming the American national self-image on many levels (Pluto in Sagittarius), it may be that the public is so desperate to identify with the noble ideals in that childhood textbook that it fails to see what is so obvious as to be staring it in the face:  that the reason America is in Iraq has little to do with government and less still with democracy. 

 

It has to do with wresting economic and political control of an oil-rich region as a critical part of a campaign of global dominion very clearly outlined in the official National Security Council Strategy  (sic) -- a document which, far from being classified information available only to insider wonks and conspiracy theorists, has been formally signed by President Bush and duly posted on the Internet (http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html).  

 

In addition to the countless installations and checkpoints it has set up in this ravaged land, the Pentagon has built sixteen permanent bases. One wonders how there could be an indication more obvious than this one that Washington views Iraq not as a potentially autonomous state, but as a staging area.

 

Jessica’s telephone number is +1 415 626 7795 and her email address is jessica@MotherSky.comHer Web Site is www.MotherSky.com.


Podcast Interview with US Astrologer Jessica Murray
A common misconception is that modern astrology makes predictions... centuries ago astrologers did, and some schools of astrology still do; most notably in those societies ..where the predominating world view follows a more fatalistic bent. It is psychology, however, rather than divination, that underlies most contemporary astrology in the West. In this interview I asked Jessica how does astrology today compare to traditional astrology of the past; and about the most common things that come up in an astrological reading. I hope you will enjoy our conversation.



© Copyright 2006 PS-Magazine.com, otherwise the author.

PS-Magazine.com and MerlianNews.com
a trans-Atlantic holistic internet resource

About PS Magazine l Terms